Archive for the 'symphony management' Category

The Art of the Turnaround

This post is addressed to anyone and everyone in Columbus who wants to see the Columbus Symphony survive and thrive.

The Art of the Turnaround, by internationally famous arts revival expert Michael Kaiser, is a must read for anyone in Columbus who wants to see the CSO through the continuing crisis. The book has detailed descriptions of each of his 10 basic rules, with longer chapters on Kaiser’s successful turnarounds with the Kansas City Ballet, Alvin Ailey Dance, American Ballet Theater, Royal Opera House and The Kennedy Center in Washington, DC.

The musicians have given back a huge sum toward the effort of invigorating the CSO. Additionally for my part, I have ceased writing critically of the organization.

To nudge CSO leadership in the right direction, I list the 10 “rules” suggested by Kaiser as a critical foundation toward healing a sick arts organization. I hope we can all agree to the proven value of these foundational conditions for moving forward. Some are obvious, but others go against current thinking used to help the Columbus Symphony.

    1 Someone must lead
    2 The leader must have a plan
    3 You cannot save your way to health
    4 Focus on today and tomorrow, not yesterday
    5 Extend your programming planning calendar
    6 Marketing is more than brochures and advertisements
    7 There must be only one spokesperson and the message must be positive
    8 Fund raising must focus on the larger donor, but don’t aim too high
    9 The board must allow itself to be restructured
    10 The organization must have the discipline to follow each of these rules

If you are in a position to help the CSO, or can influence someone who is, please consider getting this book and reviewing Kaiser’s ideas. We need all the help we can get!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Thoughts on Perfection and Being Human

In the current world of perfectionist auditions and recording quality performance standards, I doubt that Maria Callas would have been much more than a talented wannabe. Her tone was too bright, her vibrato too wobbly. What a tragedy, that musicians such as that are probably being overlooked.

Will Roesch, a tuba student, wrote me a note on Facebook, inquiring about the pros and cons of perfectionism in the music world. He wrote:

I was wondering if you could offer some words of wisdom.

To be blunt I have obsessive compulsive disorder, so I’ve always struggled with the ideas of perfection, order, symmetry, and so forth. Unfortunately, even within the comforting realm of music it’s managed to manifest itself. I’ve been given a few perspectives on orchestral playing. One teacher insists perfection is the only gateway to an orchestral job; the Principal Tubist of the Chicago Symphony instilled in me there is no such thing as perfection. He told me you can only do your best, and the true mark of an orchestral musician is improving from the last audition/performance/etc.

The perfection thing is ground into me every week; and I know for a normal person it would be stressful, but for someone like me with OCD, it becomes overwhelming.

So how do you do it? Do you put unrealistic demands on yourself in an attempt to reach a specific goal, or is perfection really the goal for which I should be striving?

When I’m playing, if I start to think about the mechanics of what I’m doing, I inevitably make a mistake, but I’ve noticed when I think of something out of body or just get lost in the moment entirely, things seem to go fine. I like to think of my tuba as a dusty, forgotten leviathan that never gets the spot light, and when the time comes, it’s the one singing the song to show what beauty it has to offer, not me.

I have posted my response below. I will add to this over the next few days. I also welcome conversations about these ideas in the comments.

Will- Thanks for the intriguing explorations and questions about the various philosophies of playing music. You really got me thinking.

Since I began studying the Alexander Technique, I’ve attempted to hone the answers to such questions, both for myself and my students. We performers embody such a paradox by attempting to perfect the expression of seemingly “other-worldly” music with all too human bodies.

I think it was Van Cliburn who said something to the effect of “Music offers enough to fill a lifetime, but one life is not enough to do music justice.” Music may or may not be perfectible, but it is always improvable, and certainly worth the trouble.

So, how then do we approach such a difficult and elusive goal? The answer is both philosophical and practical.

We forever strive toward perfection by setting our sights on the heavenly goal of the perfect performance, all the while seeking the most efficient path physically. (I am reminded of Kenny Werner’s book, Effortless Mastery)

The second part of that phrase is the real key. The great performers practice not so much to perfect a piece of music, but to render performing it effortless. Ironically, perfection is all the more attainable when we get out of our own way.

Yet, our “efforts” toward “effortlessness” can become a problem in itself. Your frustration with the choice between “thinking about the mechanics” and simply “letting it happen” is symptomatic of that problem. You have the right idea in striving to let it happen in an “out of body” sort of way, but that won’t help you if you happen to be hindered by one or more physical misuses.

In that case, you need to allow yourself to step back, as many steps as necessary, possibly back to simply standing or sitting without playing, in order to find your way toward the most efficient and “effortless” use of your self, by which you can move beyond one particular limitation and on to the next. And so on and so on. Backward until you arrive at a place where forward is truly possible, then forward until you find another habit of misuse, all the while remembering that our real goal is not physical ease, but the music itself.

Think of traversing a huge river gorge in a jungle to photograph a beautiful, rare orchid. You can see the other side just a few hundred feet away, but the depth of the gap is insurmountably deep. How do you get there? You cannot just jump; wish as you may to be able to fly. You must weave your way meticulously down one face of the gorge, through many unknown and possibly endless obstacles; then cross the river, which may be a problem in itself, then scale the other side, before arriving just a few hundred feet from where you were. You must take care not to injure yourself along the way, so attention to efficient solutions to the myriad challenges is critical along the way.

Is the orchid worth all that? The only way you can answer is that you enjoyed the process of getting there (I know. Huge cliché) the challenge as well as the journey. Dreaming of the orchid along the journey helps, and it may even offer critical creative inspiration, but patience and perseverance are the real tools. Obsessing over the goal is counter productive. If you lose sleep or hurt yourself, how does that help? (Yet many musicians grow up feeding on self-destructive habits) Suppose you never quite make it? What have you gained along the way?

Seeking to attain the highest goal is vital to our motivation, but it cannot destroy our joy in the seeking, otherwise our efforts are philosophically and spiritually fruitless.

There are too many bitter musicians out there who only sought the orchid and got lost along the way.

(To give a very real example of what I just described, the process of typing my answer to your inquiries could have easily become an issue of misuse in itself, as I slouched in front of the computer typing, compulsively goal oriented instead of process oriented.)

Incidentally, I am still misusing myself in front of the computer as I type this, right after having a great, body expanding yoga class!!

I would like to add that auditions are, in my opinion, tainted by an unrealistic perfectionist culture which has permeated their practice over the past two decades. A great player takes chances. A perfect player rarely does, if ever. I can understand (without condoning) such a cookie cutter benchmark if the position is in a section. But for a principal position, I would much rather an extremely high quality player who pushes the limit a bit each time he/she plays, striving for the ever elusive beauty of the music.

I believe that any phrase can be played a number of ways, some more effective than others, but different versions of which can reach out to the listener with a slightly different version beauty. If that were not the case, then there would be only one version of every piece sold on CD.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Well written blog post about Junichi firing

Check out this post, You’re Great; Get Lost! (also available here), a well written, biting review of the motives and repercussions of firing Junichi Hirokami as Columbus Symphony Music Director.

After having very publicly fired their music director for having protested against trying to gut the orchestra, I wonder who the board thinks will agree to take his place? The world is full of conductors looking for music director jobs, of course. But ones on the level of Hirokami are few and far between. Good luck in convincing someone to work for a board that just fired the last guy for being as honest as he was competent.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Success story in Indianapolis

A graduate of the Eastman School of Music, BRUCE HEMBD has lived in Phoenix, Arizona (USA) since 1991. He performs regularly with the Arizona Opera, Southwest Brass, Quintessence Chamber Ensemble, Palo Verde Brass, Desert Chamber Musicians, Symphony of the West Valley, and the Tucson and Phoenix Symphonies, in addition to many other ensembles throughout Arizona.

Before moving to Phoenix, Bruce held principal positions with the Mexico City Philharmonic, Tucson Symphony Orchestra, and was also third hornist in the Fort Wayne Philharmonic. He has also freelanced in Europe (Austria and Germany), and in the Rochester (NY), Cleveland (OH), Houston (TX), and Chicago (IL) areas in numerous chamber ensembles, orchestras, musical shows and solo recitals.

Having grown up in Indy, I am a little familiar with their history. At one time the Indpls. Symphony performed in the dingy Clowes Hall on the campus of Butler University. Their salary was fairly average or even below average for the time back in the 1970’s.

When Raymond Leppard came to Indy in the late 80’s, he made it a mission to raise the bar significantly. The orchestra secured its own hall in downtown Indy (a beautifully renovated movie palace) and its management took an aggressive approach towards fund-raising and an endowment. Some housecleaning happened at all levels and the salaries and quality went up significantly.

The key element here I believe was strong leadership and a strong cooperative vision between symphony management and civic leaders.

Downtown Indy is a cool place to be on most evenings - not only are there symphony concerts, but also sporting events, restaurants and shopping. In comparing Columbus to Indy, we can only hope that a similar civic vision may be in store for Columbus.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Columbus Symphony like Indianapolis

(Note Tony Beadle’s comparison of the Columbus Symphony to the Indianapolis Symphony as a model to achieve. Indianapolis has a robust budget and very fair musician salaries. I believe Tony and Columbus musicians are now on the same page. Thank you Tony. Let’s hope any future negotiations continue with this kind of thinking.)

Contract clash puts fate of Ohio symphony in doubt
7/26/2008, 1:12 p.m. ET
By JULIE CARR SMYTH
The Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Sentiment these days surrounding the 57-year-old Columbus Symphony Orchestra is not so much Beethoven’s “Pastoral” as the “1812 Overture.”

The orchestra’s board of trustees suspended operations on June 1 and canceled the popular summer pops series and at least 10 fall classical concert performances, citing a projected $3 million budget shortfall. Managers and musicians have clashed over the next union contract and what direction to take the organization in the future.

If there is a future.

“It’s sort of like we’ve been at the brink,” said executive director Tony Beadle. “And now we have to go together hand in hand and illuminate what an orchestra does and what it means to a community at large.”

Fellow musicians have weighed in with their view.

“One of the great American cultural accomplishments of the 20th century was to bring access to top-quality performing arts to cities across the country,” the musicians of the Cincinnati Symphony and world-renowned Cleveland Orchestra wrote in a letter of support for Columbus players. “The loss of the Columbus Symphony Orchestra would represent a setback for the 21st century.”

A recent study by the Columbus Cultural Leadership Consortium found that arts and culture in greater Columbus is a powerful economic engine, generating $22 for every dollar spent in central Ohio compared with the $7 national average.

The analysis estimated that $330 million is spent each year in the region by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and their audiences, with the Columbus Symphony being in the top tier of the city’s cultural food chain.

“Many people look to the arts as an indicator of the quality of life in this community. This does not help that mission,” Beadle said.

“But, over and above that, is that the Columbus Symphony as a musical ensemble is fantastic. It’s just one of those lucky circumstances that all the right components were put together on stage to produce fantastic music.”

Musicians credit better salaries with attracting the quality players that have built the orchestra’s critical acclaim over the years. The lowest paid Columbus Symphony musician makes $55,200 a year, compared with $75,400 for the Indianapolis Symphony, $91,900 for the Cincinnati Symphony, $101,452 for the Pittsburgh Symphony and $110,760 for Cleveland, according to data from the American Federation of Musicians.

“I think it’s taken decades to build the Columbus Symphony into the high-quality organization it is,” said Douglas Fisher, president of the Central Ohio Federation of Musicians, which represents 53 symphony musicians. “Forcing us to accept the Draconian cuts proposed by the board basically would destroy everything we’ve built.”

Board president Robert Trafford has said reaching a new agreement with the musicians’ union is the only way to rescue the symphony.

The board’s initial proposal sought to reduce the symphony’s annual expense budget from $12 million to $9.5 million, or 12.5 percent, and the number of full-time orchestra musicians from 53 to 31. Paid weeks per year would fall from 46 to 34, cutting the playing season by a quarter.

“The orchestra has had a history of a structural deficit, which means, all other things being equal and without outside gifts, you’re outspending what you’re taking in,” said Beadle, who spent seven years managing the Boston Pops.

Beadle said Columbus musicians need to look to peer orchestras — such as Indianapolis — when determining whether their salaries are fair, not to the likes of the Cleveland Orchestra, one of the “Big Five” orchestras in America.

“I maintain everybody here would like to pay them as much as we possibly can, because we honor the profession and honor what they do, but start benchmarking yourself to your collegial orchestras,” he said.

Fisher said the orchestra’s structural deficit cannot be blamed on how much musicians are paid. After musicians agreed to an 11 percent pay cut in 2005, the Columbus Symphony’s budget for artistic expenses has remained on or under budget every year, according to a financial analysis commissioned by the union. Last year, ticket sales were up 24 percent.

“We agreed to $1.3 million in cuts in exchange for the promise of a new director, a new executive director and other changes,” he said. “They didn’t do the things they promised. It’s really a problem of governance, and that will continue until the right people are given the keys to the organization.”

Last year, the symphony joined with other area arts organizations — including Columbus’ ballet, opera, art museums and adult and children’s theater companies — in a joint fundraising effort aimed largely at making the best use of big donors’ dollars in a shared funding arrangement.

But the effort may have come too late for the symphony. Without a contract by Aug. 31, the 2008-2009 season will be canceled and, Fisher fears, reviving the orchestra could be impossible.

In hopes of retaining community interest and keeping musicians from relocating for other jobs, symphony musicians have put together self-funded summer concerts under the name Musicians of the Columbus Symphony.

Beadle is optimistic a compromise will be struck.

“We need to find it within ourselves to find the commonality of wanting to have a symphony orchestra, provide a lively community for musicians and serve the city of Columbus,” he said.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Thinking outside the incendiary “box”

I’ve decided that the path we are on is not going to get us anywhere. I removed the post about Tony Beadle. I may have my presumptions as to who it may or may not be, but that is not the point, at least not when it comes to looking where we are going. It’s like saying to the man responsible for maintaining a leak-proof boat, as you are about to go over Niagara Falls in a canoe, “You failed at your job of preventing leaks!!” Too late for that now.

I’ve also decided that all this bickering does no good. The situation is what it is now. Everyone should leave the past behind as well as they can and really look at ways to make this work in the present and future. The musicians cannot take all the financial responsibility, but it is not the Board’s fault entirely for the situation the symphony is in. Or, even if I think it is, the time has come to seek constructive solutions. I tried to explain this idea to an eleven year old son of a friend; If someone says to you, “you suck!” you feel it is your right to respond, “YOU suck!” and they in turn feel the same. It goes on and on until someone takes the high road.

As I see it, there are 3 main components to a successful symphony…the musicians, the Board, and the administration. (Addendum- I failed to mention one of the most important parts of a successful symphony- THE PUBLIC! No orchestra can consider itself a viable part of its city’s culture without passionate and persistent outreach to the community.) If these are not all working together in harmony and with trust in each other, no good can come of it, and there most definitely won’t be any success. New tactics and EARNEST, SINCERE negotiating needs to be happening. I feel like in the past few months, the major players in all this have been waging an elementary school playground battle, except that a lot of livelihoods are at stake. Maybe I’m crazy…or maybe I’m just asking too much from the people negotiating.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Rootless Directors and Ungrateful Musicians

One commenter on my post Today’s Dispatch Article is worth quoting, not so much for his comment, but for the passionate response from Cameron Kopf, a “professional horn player throughout Northern California”, in his own words. Both are long comments, but I think they are worth your time.

Here is the comment from Steve S:

I appreciate you pointing out that Mr. Beadle is probably not the best person to have stated what he stated about Mr. Hirokami. That being said, I think there is a lot of truth to his statements. The music director does need to be a face, and does need to understand the way an American symphony orchestra works. Hirokami’s incredibly negative comments about his employer showed that lack of understanding. In the end, there is no way to know who’s really not doing their “job,” but what Hirokami did was just plain stupid. I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t work in American for a very long time because of this.

You imply in your last sentence that the board is dysfunctional. I would like to hear an explanation of that allegation other than you not getting the paycheck amount you desire. I’m sure we would also love to hear how you would react if the tables were turned, if a board member told an orchestra musician that they were incompetent. You’re an expert fundraiser? Who is exactly? You get paid because some people out there think what you do is important. No one is taking advantage of you, no one is earning a profit. A board is all-volunteer, and your salaries are paid because they beg people to give you their money with absolutely no return on their investment.

All this finger-pointing is what is running your orchestra to the ground, not any one person or group of people. Orchestral musicians are LUCKY to have the jobs they have, and sometimes that luck just runs out. When you place your livelihood in the hands of the good-will of people, then shame on you for placing expectations on anyone to provide anything for you. Playing an instrument entitles you to nothing, no matter how good at it you might be.

And here is Cameron Kopf’s response:

Steve S., who are you? What are your qualifications to make such negative judgements about musicians and their profession?

It is easy to cast such aspersions when you do not include your full name.

You write: “The music director does need to be a face, and does need to understand the way an American symphony orchestra works.”

Please enlighten us how an American symphony orchestra works.

As a professional horn player for thirty-two years, who has held contracts with the Nashville Symphony, Sacramento Symphony, San Jose Symphony and have performed with many other musical ensembles, I have seen various living situations of conductors. Some are full-time residents, others maintain part-time residences, while others fly in from their home cities to attend to the business at hand in their orchestra.

This is an increasingly global society. It is no longer necessary for a conductor to maintain a residence in the same city as the orchestra is located. This is understood by many top-tier orchestra managements; they do not require the conductors to live in town.

Please refer to the following blog, by a noted conductor in Canada, for more on this topic: Pull up the roots…

You write: “Hirokami’s incredibly negative comments about his employer showed that lack of understanding. In the end, there is no way to know who’s really not doing their “job,” but what Hirokami did was just plain stupid.”

Perhaps the conductor did not exercise his best judgment by making such statements, but the fact still stands: the Columbus Symphony is in serious trouble and what can be done to save it?

As a long-time member of both Orchestra and Negotiating committees in the now-defunct Sacramento Symphony, and witness to other California orchestras which have gone under, placing the blame on the musicians is a common, misguided tactic. It serves no constructive purpose and is in fact destructive; it distracts attention away from the most critical issues, which are the orchestra management and Board’s responsibility.

You write: “You imply in your last sentence that the board is dysfunctional. I would like to hear an explanation of that allegation other than you not getting the paycheck amount you desire.”

Perhaps you have not done your homework or researched this situation on your own. Have you spoken with any musicians about it? Have you read their press releases? I am not referring to the Columbus Dispatch’s curiously negative bias on the situation.

You write: “You’re an expert fundraiser? Who is exactly? You get paid because some people out there think what you do is important. No one is taking advantage of you, no one is earning a profit. A board is all-volunteer, and your salaries are paid because they beg people to give you their money with absolutely no return on their investment.”

Symphony orchestras provide what is known as the “arts multiplier factor” which generates revenue for businesses related to the entertainment industry, such as restaurants, parking garages, stores, among others. To lose the Columbus Symphony would curtail spending downtown.

It is not the job of musicians to fund-raise. We are trained professionals who have spent countless hours (and dollars) at our craft. OUR job is to provide the best musical product possible on the concert stage. This is a full-time occupation, requiring many hours of practice to maintain the highest artistic standards. Ultimately it is the management and board’s responsibility to ensure that the organization is healthy, and represents the community in which the orchestra performs.

Musicians are glad to help in any way they can, EXCEPT for cutting their own throats. They should not have to do this in order to save the organization; it is not the musicians’ responsibility.

Musicians do indeed understand and appreciate that the Board consists of volunteers, and we sincerely seek CONSTRUCTIVE solutions to problems. This does not excuse the board members from less-than successful methods of maintaining and building an orchestra. When problems arise, it is vitally important to address them in a way that does not diminish the music product that they are “selling”. Clearly, the current offer to the musicians would result in a serious degradation of the artistic standard of the Columbus Symphony, and less people would be willing to support it.

It is important to approach the situation with constructive, positive solutions rather than laying the blame on the musicians for not accepting drastic cuts — which would be a DEstructive solution indeed.

The fact is, cutting musicians and their salaries does not create a healthier organization. Quite the opposite. It would be the beginning of a downward spiral ultimately resulting in the organization’s demise.

Your final statement is furthest off the mark: “Orchestral musicians are LUCKY to have the jobs they have, and sometimes that luck just runs out. When you place your livelihood in the hands of the good-will of people, then shame on you for placing expectations on anyone to provide anything for you. Playing an instrument entitles you to nothing, no matter how good at it you might be.”

It is a shame that many people do not understand what it takes to be a musician. Yes, we are lucky to have jobs. You are lucky to have the job YOU have. Those of us who are employed are lucky in general, aren’t we?

You say, “sometimes that luck just runs out”. Would you say that to a doctor or lawyer? Musicians spend just as much time on their profession as those people. Providing art to a community is every bit as valuable as providing medical care or legal counsel.

Your most telling statement “Playing an instrument entitles you to nothing, no matter how good at it you might be”.

This attitude says it all. I sincerely hope that you are NOT on the Columbus Symphony’s board. If you are, you are seriously misguided, and have no business being on it.

The musicians of the Columbus Symphony have been MORE than willing to try to reach a constructive solution with the management and board. The latter has not been willing to do the same. So perhaps they are not truly interested in maintaining the organization or fostering its growth.

It would be a shame to lose the Columbus Symphony because of this lack of cooperation and vision. Judging from the recent accolades by the audience of the recent outdoor concert given by the Columbus Symphony musicians, they would be greatly disappointed indeed.

Sincerely,
Cameron Kopf
professional horn player throughout Northern California

  • Share/Save/Bookmark



SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline